That’s basically the whole article. I don’t have much more to say other than Charlie Hunnam went hiking yesterday. And he looks hot hiking. Hottest? Not quite the hottest. If he had a dog with him that would make it hotter, non? Why doesn’t Charlie Hunnam have a dog? Oh right. He’s a germophobe, specifically because of dogs. As he explained in an interview with ELLE recently, he’s so afraid of germs that he hates sex scenes and only wants to kiss his girlfriend because:

“When I was maybe eight or nine, there was a parasite from dogs in the north of England that, if you ingested it, could turn you blind. We had a thing in schools to educate the kids about the importance of hygiene, specifically around dogs, because we had a few kids who went blind. That horrified me. The point is, everyone thinks it's great to be an actor and get to kiss a bunch of beautiful actresses in films, but I actually hate it.”

I’m going to assume that’s why he doesn’t have a dog with him. And probably doesn’t have a dog at all. So, we can’t be together.

Fashion question: thoughts on what he’s wearing? His hiking outfit?

I think it looks really good on him. It’s the kind of thing a celebrity can pull off. And Jacek, my husband, could totally pull it off, in theory. HIS theory, however, is that because he’s not a celebrity, he’d end up looking like a douchebag if he walked around like this in our neighbourhood with our dogs. Like a try-hard douchebag. Agree or disagree?