Disclaimer: This article was posted during an early period of the site when some of the writing was extremely offensive. Since then our site has grown and evolved. We have apologised, continue to take accountability, and documented our changes. Please see our FAQ on our About page for our formal statement.

A lot of you have been sending me this today: the New York Times video featuring (mostly) world class actors “acting” for a minute.

Let’s call this what it is, ok? It’s a little pretentious and contrived. Come on now…

The black and white, the music, the self involvement disguised as art – this kind of sh-t alienates people. Having said that, it’s given us a lot to talk about. And most of you are talking about James Franco’s portrait. James Franco flirting with James Franco.

I don’t know…

I didn’t bother me as much as I thought it would. It didn’t actually bother me at all. I WENT TO FILM SCHOOL bothered me. This actually wasn’t bad. At least not to me. And you know, you know I can’t bear Franco these days. You know he’s become my giant eyeroll.

You know who was bad though?

I’m sorry to say this, because I love him and he’s adorable, but Jesse Eisenberg’s was probably the worst. (OK maybe a tie for first with Chloe Moretz. Suddenly she exhausts me.) Jesus. I had to look away. And not in a good way like for Tilda Swinton whose bare one minute acting made me genuinely uncomfortable. Same goes for Michael Douglas. They’re excellent.

Then there’s Javier Bardem – sex. And Matt Damon – good, but woah the pudge. And the best, obviously, Robert Duvall. Because he was probably like – what do you mean shoot me in a room doing nothing but “acting”. What kind of new age arty bullsh-t is that? I’m just gonna shave. Look, I need to shave. You can film that. So they did.

Click here to see all of them.

 

 

Share this post