Pippy at the Kodak?

First…a disclaimer. The following was reported by the National Enquirer. Still, it’s more accurate than In Touch or Life & Style. Or those dipsh*t sources claiming that Lance Armstrong ditched Kate Hudson because she’s too “needy”.

Please.

Kate Hudson is not Jennifer Aniston.

But Lance must have suffered some kind of ego bruise to send his pack out in his defence and at the expense of Kate’s reputation. Douche.

Segue…

Remember when Kate hooked up with the Pipper?

Well according to the Enquirer, Justin Timberlake is being suggested by the Academy as a possible host for the Oscars. This after his successful gig at the ESPYs. After all, he was only a tiny bit racialist during the non televised portion, as Ali G would say. Is being a tiny bit racialist totally ok?

Apparently.

Because curiously enough, JT’s gaffe received almost NO media play whatsoever. But if it had been anyone else, their career would be completely f&cked. Just like it was Janet who took the hit for that boob fiasco while he escaped unscathed.

Love the inequity, don’t you?

As for the Oscars… the telecast has been on a ratings sh*tter for years. Apparently, in an effort to attract younger viewers, Pips is being considered to ring in the new wave which, to be fair, even though he’s a megalomaniac, would certainly do the trick. For the television audience, that is. But what about the actual audience?

Picture Jack Nicholson having to endure 4 hours of Pippy on stage squeaking away. Jon Stewart skewering Jack is one thing. But subjecting Jack to a dressing down by a boy who can’t find his own balls?

Painful.

Maybe in a few years? But please not now.

PS. The other name they’re tossing around is supposedly Tina Fey. Me likey. Me also likey Will Ferrell. Or Jack Black. Or both. Will Ferrell and Jack Black are always gold at the Oscars.